On Wed, 18 May 2011 16:50:54 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Wed, 18 May 2011 14:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello Camaleón, > >> Pop3 was not designed to keep the messages on the server, having such >> option is not the norm but the exception (many e-mail server do not >> have > > Cam, if you want to be all Humpty Dumpty about it(0), fine. Just don't > expect us to accept your corrupt definitions of words. If you continue > arguing that download == download and delete you only undermine your > credibility in other areas.
Maybe you need to re-read the OP message to reconsider your arguments about what "download" means in this specific thread. I still don't see what's the problem in considering that a pop3 account will just download and delete all the e-mails. If the messages are not going to be deleted, then the OP would not have any problem, don't you think? > Accept you lost this argument and cease whilst you're not so far behind. Don't worry, I understand what are you trying to defend here but I'm afraid this is not just a wording problem but a conceptual one. > (0) From 'Alice Through the Looking Glass'; "When I use a word," Humpty > Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it > to mean - neither more nor less." Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.05.18.17.42...@gmail.com
