On Sun, 08 May 2011 05:55:18 -0700, CACook wrote: > On Saturday 7 May, 2011 07:04:16 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> As a current btrfs user, I don't recommend you run it on the Squeeze >> kernel (2.6.32-5) because there are certain circumstances where it >> doesn't gracefully handle out-of-space issues and that "df" reports for >> it lie. I recently filed a bug against the Debian kernel due to this; >> two BUG() calls within a second leading to a broken btrfs module and >> needing a reboot and some manual file system recovery. > > Wow, yeah. For having been years in development
It's only two years (!). We can say it's just "a baby" compared to the dinosaurs of ext2/3, reiserfs and xfs :-) > and fully financially supported by Oracle, Well, afterall is a GPL project. > this filesystem is a trainwreck. I'd say it's under development which means not suitable for production systems. > I'm ditching it. Nowadays you can use it on a testing computer. Beyond that, you risk to expose your data to almost any thing. > But I did submit a bug by email on grub-pc. > > What a mess. Scary. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.05.08.14.59...@gmail.com
