2011/4/30 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <h...@debian.org>

> How one is supposed to be able to use a 16:9 screen for any coding, report
>
writing, spreadsheet work, and even *reading*, I have no clue.  Hell, it is
> useless even for presentations, and that's saying something...
>
Let's see...
Text Processor: it's not good to preview the whole page, but it's nice when
you fit to width;
Spreadsheet: Don't mind having more columns than rows - it's quite common to
print spreadsheet in landscape;
Presentations: I think it's where being compatible with TV sets matter more
- also good presentation (to me) has no bullets and lots of pictures and
also some video;
Coding: I can't see the difference? May be having two windows tiled could be
nice...


> I mean, I can get some use out of 16:9 >22" screens as I just use them as
> if
> they were two smaller screens side by side or get a monitor that lets me
> rotate the screen, but in a small notebook?
>
I think you can still call a ~15" portable... and I think I prefer a second
screen with the same size/resolution.


> IMO tablets WILL kill the notebook in the next five years, if only because
> a
> tablet can be used in the proper orientation for serious work (including
> reading) AND you can attach a bluetooth keyboard to it.
>
I'm quite sure they will compete with netbookd and e-readers, but I think
mosy people who is buying standard notebooks are those with eventual
mobility. Notebooks become an alternative do desktop because of silence,
size, power consumption and, just in case, portability.

Reply via email to