Denny Schierz put forth on 2/20/2011 11:56 AM: > hi, > > Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 20:37 +0800 schrieb Justin Jereza: > >> I'd consider running clvm + gfs2 instead. That way, both nodes can >> stay up and connected to the same filesystem at the same time. The >> only decision left would be which node to use. OTOH, you can have an >> HA configuration as well. > > two points against gfs: > > 1. I red very often, that GFS is very slow > 1.1 So we have to create files and export them too as ISCSI targets. > 2. We want to export ISCSI devises for other OS, like Windows, Solaris, > OSX etc. So we stick on plain ISCSI exports: > > @Stan? > > For what we need drbd? Cloning? We don't need, cause all hosts can see > the disks.
Maybe I didn't understand your application need correctly. Can you describe, in some detail, exactly what you need to accomplish, from a high level overview perspective (i.e. machine and OS independent--think flow chart)? It's not clear to me at this point if you need real time file/filesystem sharing or simply manual fail over from a dead host to a backup server. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d61ca36.7070...@hardwarefreak.com
