On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:18:02PM -0600, Qi Qi wrote: > Thanks, Freeman. The problem is solved. I just manually keep back evolution's > upgrade in aptitude, and then all the others were upgraded smoothly. Now > my debian is on unstale version. My source list do jumping among stable, > testing, and unstable, and unstable's has the highest priority. The good > thing of this way is rolling upgrade.
Sorry! I should have stopped rushing and read your post with more care. You clearly indicated unstable and I responded for squeeze! > > Still another dependency conflict loop is constituded by upgrading of > evolution and libgtkhtml3.14-19. This dependency conflict needs to > resolve. It's probably on the way. > Something is always on the way. I am even getting late upgrades in squeeze stable. I recently read here that unstable can be more stable than testing. When in testing, my radeon card lost support in fglrx. Part of the solution was firmware-linux-* from unstable/experimental. The other part was a sid kernel. Since I still run those, I guess I am not in stable, rather, stable/mixed. -- Regards, Freeman "Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO (or Linux) is the answer." --Somebody -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110216190943.GA9102@Europa.office
