On 16 February 2011 02:47, Jochen Schulz <m...@well-adjusted.de> wrote:
> I would be surprised to find something like this. The fork has purely > political reasons and as it is still quite young, it shouldn't have > deviated from OOo by much until now. LibreOffice includes the patchset that was GO-OO that neither Sun or Oracle would comit to the repo, so it was maintained as a separate patchset. Debian previously shipped GO-OO not Sun OO or Oracle OO >> I am interested in what LibreOffice offers that makes it easier to >> use, fewer bugs, features or lack thereof. > > Don't expect any of this today. I guess that it is currently even less > stable/mature. Pure Conjecture, Debian by shipping LibreOffice is shipping pretty much the exact same software that it used to ship as OO.o (GO-OO) so the stability/maturity should not have apreciably changed? Adrian -- 24x7x365 != 24x7x52 Stupid or bad maths? <erno> hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it responds to ping, it works completely, I just can't figure out where in my apartment it is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikMTiJG9+BEQ+WZKJL5hxKw-e-eqr=aduvgv...@mail.gmail.com
