On Tuesday 15 February 2011 08:22:53 Erwan David wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 03:08:22PM CET, > Frank Lanitz <fr...@frank.uvena.de> said: > > I'm afraid you missed a lot of news last weeks/month. MySQL, Solaris, > > OpenOffice (which now became to Oracle OpenOffice)...... > > And now are fears for Qt...
Well, that has nothing to do with Oracle. Given Qt's licensing and the number of KDE developers that are comfortable patching it, I imagine a fork would be easy if necessary. That said, the Qt open governance project hasn't died, yet. Really, there are no indications that Nokia would be taking Qt in a more proprietary direction. With their current positioning, it is more likely that they gradually stop development of Qt rather than try to monetize it, but that's just my speculation and I get all my information from the interwebs so I'm likely wrong. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
