On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 07:53:23AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Camaleón put forth on 2/8/2011 4:55 AM: > > On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:34:33 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > > >> On 08/02/11 11:30, hamed hosseini wrote: > > > >>> which version for intel chipset 64bit? > > > > (...) > > > >> amd64 > > > > Or i386, that's up to the user ;-) > > Neither of these is correct if he has an Itanium box, in which case he needs > the > IA64 distro. The OP's question was vague, as Intel has two 64 bit ISAs: IA64 > and x86-64 (the latter called EM64T/Intel64/etc by Intel, depending on the > mood > of their marketing department on a given day/week/month/year--why I despise > marketing people).
IIRC, i386 should work fine whichever style of 64-bit it is. However, one of the reasons why Intel switched from IA64 to AMD64 was that IA64 is terrible at executing 32-bit code. > > -- > Stan > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d514ad3.5000...@hardwarefreak.com >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
