Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-12-09 09:15 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:37:19 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-12-08 23:41 +0100, Javier Barroso wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
You should use "update-rc.d network-manager disable" instead. See
update-rc.d(8).
I think update-rc.d manpage should then change example which Camaleon
referenced in her solved post:
Example of disabling a service:
update-rc.d -f foobar remove
update-rc.d foobar stop 20 2 3 4 5 .
That does still work.
Not for me. Read:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/12/msg00482.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/12/msg00494.html
Or maybe I missed something... again? :-)
No, now that I tested it I have to admit you're absolutely right. It
seems that update-rc.d actually uses the LSB headers and ignores the
command line arguments. I'm not sure that this is intended.
I think it is, from the manpage:
update-rc.d has two modes of operation for installing scripts into the
boot sequence. A legacy mode where command line arguments are used to
decide the sequence and runlevel configuration, and the default mode
where dependency and runlevel information in the init.d script LSB
comment header is used instead.
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/idr0rb$9o...@dough.gmane.org
