That is a good point. Is anyone using the 2.6.36-1~experimental.1 from experimental? Any stability issues?
--b On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Jochen Schulz <m...@well-adjusted.de> wrote: > Brad Alexander: >> >> I was thinking about setting up a btrfs filesystem on this drive since >> it will be mainly be data from my home workstation that I will be >> using on my work laptop, so the data will be safely elsewhere. Both >> the home workstation and the work laptop are running sid >> (2.6.32-5-amd64), > > My advice is to upgrade the kernel. 2.6.32 is almost a year old. If you > want to try an experimental filesystem, use the most recent version. > >> Is this a valid use case for btrfs? > > It doesn't look like you have any special needs, so any "general > purpose" FS will do. The question is whether your data is valuable or > easily recoverable from a backup. > > J. > -- > People talking a foreign language are romantic and mysterious. > [Agree] [Disagree] > <http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkzuKU4ACgkQ+AfZydWK2znMEwCgiL3mKZolKfYhz2uZivcv1v3I > cVcAnR0HYnWryqtyW0KoPYWMNa6UuC6l > =h4cy > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinx28qxbuw2=q_8ykagpefpearvir0sp-9kw...@mail.gmail.com
