> > Mozilla products are memory/CPU hogs, yes. I hope newer versions can > > correct that. > > I often wonder about this; IIRC, FF used to advertise itself as > "lightweight". Does it still do that? Was it ever accurate?
Maybe at version 1.0...but it just seems to become more and more bloated with each release. Quite disappointing, really. How does Seamonkey fare at performance/resource handling? Is it any better than FF? I haven't used it in quite some time. -- Petrus Validus [email protected] If there isn't a way, I'll make one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
