On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:53:27 +0200
Andrei Popescu <andreimpope...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Lu, 15 nov 10, 09:21:54, Celejar wrote:
> > 
> > Perhaps I took it the wrong way, but I thought that the maintainer
> > could have been a bit more cooperative and sympathetic, given that
> > we're dealing with a repo which is widely used and practically
> > official, even though it technically isn't.
> 
> While I tend to agree with you, it seems to me DDs are not very 
> enthusiastic about work done outside the Debian Project. In most cases 
> their skepticism is justified (it's not just a case of NIH[1]).

But that's exactly the point!  Camaleón asked why someone wouldn't use
dmo, and I responded by pointing out that there will be inevitable
conflicts between packages from dmo and the official repos, and I noted
that DDs may just brush you off if you report such problems.

Celejar
-- 
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101116151321.94f69892.cele...@gmail.com

Reply via email to