Aaron Toponce put forth on 7/27/2010 10:41 AM: > XFS has also had a history for randomly corrupting data. While this > might have improved over time, I don't trust it.
Can you cite or reference anything to back your claim? Time frame? Irix or Linux? Serious users reported this or casual/hobbyist users? If this was ever the case the situation could not have lasted long before patches fixed it. Have you seen SGI's customer list and the size of the systems and storage they run with nothing but XFS? For instance, NAS has over 1.4PB of XFS filesystems, 1PB CXFS and over 400TB XFS: http://www.nas.nasa.gov/Resources/Systems/columbia.html http://www.nas.nasa.gov/Resources/Systems/archive_storage.html NASA trusts it with over 1PB of storage, but _you_ don't trust it? Who are you again? How many hundreds of TB of storage do you manage on EXT3/4? ;) -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c4f1551.8010...@hardwarefreak.com
