To me squeeze is very stable. I have since moved to sid and surprisingly, it seems just as stable (to me that is) Sent from my BlackBerry®
-----Original Message----- From: Hanspeter Spalinger <deb...@spahan.ch> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:27:46 To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: Re: How 'stable' is squeeze? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Am 24.06.10 00:26, schrieb Amar Cosic: > Hello list > > I was thinking about upgrade to squeeze and just want to check if everything > is OK there? No 'critical' bugs etc.. ? I know a lot of you use squeeze so > its probably best place to ask > > > Regards > I use squeeze for my desktop workstation (web-things, IM, torrents, multimedia-things, games) and my local server (web, files, tor, dns). I had one arch-specific bug (which was fixed by check the bugtracker and edit a config file) but beside that no problems (less those I made by playing around). This is for ppc64-arch, I expected more trouble (kudos to debian-team). For non-critical systems I personaly consider squeeze 'ready for use' (but I wont let my mailserver use it until its stable ;-p) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAkwipoEACgkQpjmLjrU66/7JmAD/dZ7Zndl72wiPkDW08hEdxI4i SfQsHmOgXLR0KrP1qiQBALRjBHi7ZJoJxRtBtiamSB8eH1Vn/TreF1LejSrwh1bK =E67V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c22a682.1040...@spahan.ch
