Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 13:35:13 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-05-19 20:00 +0200, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
I have my own kernel installed:
h...@debian:~/.fvwm$ dpkg -l | grep linux-image
ii linux-image-2.6.33.3-hvw 1 Linux kernel binary
image for version 2.6.33.3-hvw
ii linux-image-2.6.33.4-hvw 1 Linux kernel binary
image for version 2.6.33.4-hvw
no headers and no other debian images.
When I do a apt-get dist-upgrade though I see:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
...linux-image-2.6-486 linux-image-2.6.32-5-486...
Do you have mindi installed? Otherwise I cannot see a package in
sid/experimental that would pull in linux-image-2.6-486.
Bingo. It's mindi. The funny thing is I install mondo(with mindi) from
upstream because its support on Debian has fallen by the wayside:
current is 2.2.9.3-1 and debian still has 1:2.2.7-2.1.
Two patch levels (2.2.9 vs. 2.2.7) is fallen by the wayside? Really? It
looks like some of those changes even got integrated into the package -- there
was an NMU for it (Debian revision 2.1).
Depending on the scope of patch level changes on this project (x.y.z -> x =
Major, y = Minor, z = Patch level), I don't think missing a few is a big deal.
-- Rogério Brito <rbr...@ime.usp.br> Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:45:43 -0300
is the last Debian update from upstream.
2.2.9.3-1 was announced April 16, 2010, which I use. That is 7.5 months
without activity. Depending on what the change is from 2.2.7 to 2.2.9
that might be a big deal.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ht444f$gl...@dough.gmane.org
