-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 08 September 2003 09:14 am, Joey Harrison wrote: > I understand there are no security updates for > testing/unstable, because they are so fluid, but what > exactly is the difference between them and, between > the two, which is more reliable and better for someone > who wants bleeding-edge packages that have at least a > safe level of critical bugs? > > ===== > --Joey-- If 'bleeding-edge is what you want then unstable is the version to use, i.e Testing has the same vesion of Evolution that Woody has, no Abiword, etc... - -- Greg Madden Debian GNU/Linux -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/XMBWk7rtxKWZzGsRAtbLAJ4oL6hjUouVo1hCwIknfbPHu76X9QCgxauo w04TKtO56hmxaZXlYMEzYJE= =WaIz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
