On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 21:14, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 30 April 2010 06:16:22 James Stuckey wrote: >> The unstable/sid doesn't have to be comment out. Setting the default >> release will keep the system tracked to, in this case, testing. > > Er, mostly. > > If there is a versioned dependency that can be satisfied from sid but not > testing, you will get the package from sid. This shouldn't happen given the > way testing is managed, unless you installed at least one package from sid. > >> How did the packages from sid get installed in the first place? If you're >> tracking something, you have to give it an explicit "aptitude install -t >> sid <package>" command, right? > > With the official testing and sid repositories that should be true. It would > only happen if someone manually fixed up testing and did it wrong. > -- > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. > [email protected] ((_/)o o(\_)) > ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' > http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/ >
You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system by apt-show-versions | grep unstable -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
