On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:39:03PM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > > Twas brillig at 17:32:51 19.04.2010 UTC+02 when > luca.mercia...@student.ulg.ac.be did gyre and gimble: > > >> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never. > ML> And what do you suggest if one wants some real protection _and_ the > ML> benefits of a format like PDF? Thanks. > > There is no "real" protection. > > -- > http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
This is one of the reasons why people who seek to use DRM will not allow their software to be made for Free Software Platforms. DRM is not in the best interest of the users/re-users of content. And by adding DRM, you tell the user that he/she did not buy the content but is renting it until you decide otherwise. People have proven, again and again, that they are capable of circumventing DRM, so it is not an issue of 'if' they will break DRM but when. And it only hinders legitimate user of your content, those who wish to follow these restrictions. From my recollection, KPDF has an option to 'enable' the compliance with the 'do not print' feature. But it is not enabled by default. -- | .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux == | http://kevix.myopenid.com | | : :' : The Universal OS | mysite.verizon.net/kevin.mark/ | | `. `' http://www.debian.org/ | http://counter.li.org [#238656]| |___`-____Unless I ask to be CCd, assume I am subscribed _________| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100419164528.gd5...@horacrux
