"Mark Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This is what my table looked like: > > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface > localnet * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 > 217.149.32.0 * 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 > default 217.149.34.113 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 > default 192.168.8.4 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 > > so what do I need to do? > > Just keep: route add -net 192.168.3.0/24 eth0 ? > > Thanks again. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kevin Buhr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Mark Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:28 AM > Subject: Re: Routing > > > > Kevin Buhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > route add -net 192.168.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0 > > > > Oh, and David Z Maze is probably correct. Even if this works, it > > probably isn't what you want to do anyway. > > > > When you only brought "eth0" up and were able to reach the > > 192.168.3/24 and 10.1.0/24 networks, what did your routing table look > > like? If you had a 192.168.8.0/255.255.255.0 route to eth0 and a > > default route to a specific gateway machine (say 192.168.8.1), then > > packets to those other networks were going out via that gateway > > machine and you want to duplicate that environment in your new > > configuration. > > > > -- > > Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
