On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 09:08 +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote: > Unfortunately, for dealing with most editors of scientific journals, > and for personal use of the scientific literature, either as author or > referee, neither the readers you mention, nor any one other I know > except acroread, are enough. Because of these problems (which are not > unique to acroread), most my colleagues have turned to either > Microsoft or Apple for the desktop. I intend to stick to Debian also > for the desktop, but such affairs are wasting our time. We can not > devote more time to have acroread running than for a scientific code. > At present, the second task has become easier that the trivial affair > of having office tools running.
Umm... what exactly is wrong with xpdf? I use it routinely, authoring and refereeing. I find it light and fast. evince works too, though I find xpdf faster. I do not understand your problem. Drew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1267431567.6859.2.ca...@pug
