> ¿NTFS? It should fit some of your requirements (works on windows, linux
> and MacOS -I think-) and allows ACL.
It's not so much user ACL but the whole executable/read/write issue (I
get a bit sick of 100s of, eg. photos being marked executable, and
having to manually sort it out) — does NTFS support those kinds of
attributes?
> A networked hard disk (stand-alone enclosure or attached to a computer
> via samba/nfs/sshfs) is desiderable when several OS need access on it.
> This way, filesystem does not matter at all :-)
Unless there's no network ;) The context is me (a) spending 90% of my
time on Debian, but (b) being able to unplug the drive, take it
somewhere else, possibly with or without internet access or a LAN, and
having a better-than-miniscule chance of reading and writing to it.
But I think I should spend some more time doing some research (or give
up and hope the target computer supports EXT2). It seems like an
impossible problem — there's no intersection between {filesystems that
do what I want} and {filesystems supported by certain complacent and
closed operating systems} and {filesystems with up-to-date tools}.
Besides, I already paid for the USB HDD :P
— Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/d69956981002160426n1b3379b4h3ca6646a36fbb...@mail.gmail.com
