On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 10:29 -0800, [email protected] wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 17:03 -0800, PETER EASTHOPE wrote: > > Sorry for the absence of thread connection. This mailer doesn't > > provide In-reply-to. > <snip> > > > Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:10:16 +0000, Tixy <[email protected]> > wrote, > > I think it does, check the headers :-) > > The login for the Web based mailer is here. > http://webmail.shaw.ca/ > The header is minimal. I couldn't find any > way to specify an In-reply-to parameter. > If you can tell me where it is, I'll happily > use it in the future.
Err, both the message I just quoted and the one I originally replied to have an "In-reply-to" header when I look at the message source, and they are correctly threaded by my email program (Evolution). I don't know how the headers got there, but if your mailer didn't do it, then there must be some magic going on somewhere. Or where you referring to a different message not having a thread connection? -- Tixy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
