2010/1/10 Andrei Popescu <[email protected]>: > On Fri,08.Jan.10, 22:57:50, green wrote: >> >> I would consider Samba to be more secure (other thoughts anyone?); I feel >> cautious about giving someone a network-accessible shell. >> >> Samba will limit access to a specific folder. > > There are various ways to limit access to sftp only if an additional > server is not desired and speed is not an issue. >
Speed is an issue (transfering gigs), but if it is not excessively slow than we could live with it. What are the various ways? I have googled a bit, but found nothing better than a simple user account for him. -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
