On Saturday 21 November 2009 18:47:38 Chris wrote: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:41:18 +0000 > > Lisi <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday 21 November 2009 18:05:40 Chris wrote: > > > While Ubu 9.10 (assuming) is *nice and flashy* > > > > To some of us, well one of me anyway, that is a contradiction in > > terms. Something cannot be both nice and flashy - it must be either > > or. ;-) > > > > Lisi > > ... Redefined... Ubu 9.10 (assuming) is both nice (to use, as in ease) > AND flashy (visually). Not a contradiction at all. > > Perhaps I should have taken the time to define that however, knowing > the Op was using Ubu to begin with, I assumed the Op knew exactly what > I meant and how it was meant.
That was exactly what I took you to mean. I just don't agree with you. For me it is a contradiction in terms. And I did make it clear a) that I realise that I may be in a small minority in that and b) that I was not entirely serious. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
