Dne, 20. 10. 2009 09:31:38 je Vincenzo Tibullo napisal(a): > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Il giorno Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:55:37 +0200 > Klistvud <quotati...@aliceadsl.fr> ha scritto: > > | Dne, 16. 10. 2009 12:50:43 je Klistvud napisal(a): > | > Dne, 16. 10. 2009 12:19:03 je Cameron Hutchison napisal(a): > | > > Klistvud <quotati...@aliceadsl.fr> writes: > | > > > ... > | > > > | > > # chgrp users /path/to/shared/directory > | > > # chmod g+s /path/to/shared/directory > | > > > ... > | > | Anybody care to chime in? The question was: how does /usr/local > | manage to assign a predefined group ownership to every file you > copy > | to /usr/ local? Can such behaviour be replicated for an arbitrary > | directory in my /home subtree? > | > > You have received the correct answer from Cameron, what else you > want? > > If you copy or create a file, it works exactly as /usr/local, the > file > has the same group as the destination dir. > If you move a file, it works exactly as /usr/local, the file retains > its group. > > > - -- > Vincenzo Tibullo > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkrdZ1oACgkQVC1WJss4YhefAQCfbA9DjgiIU5xLXdPvr98X65cj > rZwAn2NXJHdrysHRoPYKLIy80Z33dtiK > =T9zZ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
<BLUSH> You're so right. I've been trying out Cameron's solution through a nfs share; it seems that the directory listing was cached or whatever, fact is, the changed permissions from previous attempts weren't updated on my local display and were still showing the permissions from *before* I had actually applied Cameron's instructions. Apologies to Cameron and all other listers who might have gotten misled by my ramblings... </BLUSH> -- Regards, Klistvud Certifiable Loonix User #481801 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
