On 2009-10-14 14:15 +0200, Nuno Magalhães wrote: >> More interesting would be the status of libsqlite3-0, since that is what >> xulrunner-1.9.1 links against. > > I have packages xulrunner-1.9 (1.9.0.14-1) and xulrunner-1.9.1 > (1.9.1.3-3) installed. Would it be safe to remove 1.9 alone? Apt wants > to remove 1.9*
If nothing depends on xulrunner-1.9 anymore, it can be safely removed. I have already done so myself. >>> So why is firefox complaining my sqlite is old?! >> >> Maybe you have an older version of sqlite somewhere, e.g. under >> /usr/local/lib? > > # ls -l /usr/local/lib/ |grep sqlite > -rw-r--r-- 1 root staff 2525334 2009-05-08 14:23 libsqlite3.a > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 828 2009-05-08 14:23 libsqlite3.la > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 19 2009-05-08 14:24 libsqlite3.so -> > libsqlite3.so.0.8.6 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 19 2009-05-08 14:24 libsqlite3.so.0 -> > libsqlite3.so.0.8.6 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 487448 2009-05-08 14:23 libsqlite3.so.0.8.6 Try moving these out of the way. > Do i? Wouldn't it be upgraded anyway? Not by Debian, at least. Packages must not contain files under /usr/local and leave existing ones there alone. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
