On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 08:22:45 +0200, "Stefan Waidele jun." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 00:17:47 +0200, > > "Stefan Waidele jun." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >>Arnt Karlsen wrote: > >> > >>>On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:09:10 -0500, > >>>Alex Malinovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> > >>>>[...] > >>>>I have a few dozen small programs that I've tacked a GPL notice > >>>>onto just in case, yet that have never ventured off of my hard > >>>>disk because they are one half step above being absolutely broken, > >>>>and definitely not ready for prime-time. :) > >>> > >>>..boooo, your practice here is in violation with the GPL; > >> > >>No, it's not: > >>http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPubl > >>ic > >> > >>This faq should pretty much answer the question brought up in this > >>thread. > > > > ..it _is_, it says: "But if you release the modified version to the > > public in some way, the GPL requires you to make the modified source > > code available to the program's users, under the GPL." ;-) > > But he does not release it. He wrote the software, and he keeps it for > himself on his harddisk. (He does not even need to put a comment in > like /* This stuff is GLP'd */, since nobody gets the program) ..correct, if nobody gets it, noboby uses it. If Emmas client gets it, Emmas client also needs access to the source under the GPL. > <promise>This is my last post to the list on this topic,</promise> ..I got this message twice, which one promise applies, Stefan? ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
