Micha Feigin wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:30:06 +0100 > Chris Davies <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Γιώργος Πάλλας <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> After returning from vacation I updated my testing, amd64 system. >> >> > By the way, does anybody know why they had to break things first? I did >> > not expect that from debian! >> >> I rather think that the name of the version you're running answers that >> question. If you don't want things to break, run "stable". > > The problem is that it's also so ancient that unless you are running a > server things will be too far from current as well.
What should it be so ancient?! I'm running stable on server and client and I'm not missing anything - except bugs! > > You are falling into the same hole as most and mixing the everyday meaning > of debian's stable,testing and unstable with the debian distribution > meaning. I don't understand this?! Debian is so flexible that almost nothing breaks - you are just missing the right parts ;-) regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
