> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:58:01PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:53:26 -0500 >> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Seriously, though, OO languages, being born of academia, were designed >> > *not* to be quick-'n-dirty languages. They were designed with >> > large projects in mind (the whole Software Design Life Cycle bit). >>
SDLC! What a joke!!!!! I've never seen a large project managed in any Corporation that didn't utterly suck. The notion that software development is more Organic is closer to the truth. Even with the best planning, you typically will run software development along the path of: Design it Build it Deploy it Rewrite from scratch and have something that works. Modify from there as needed to evolve with the understanding of and needs of the applications 'itch'. That's an evolutionary process. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
