---- Paul E Condon <pecon...@mesanetworks.net> wrote: > On 2009-07-15_23:53:27, ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote: [snip] > > So you have 600/630 = 95% of the job done. To finish, I suggest rsync > starting with > this as the destination of the copying. Even if the source data is changing a > bit > from day-to-day, I'm sure the great bulk of it is static. Keep repeating the > rsync
Who knows how many silent corruptions the FW drivers were slipping into the files. > update until you get a clean, no descrepancies, run. Switching to a different > disk > interface standard (and abandoning the existing 95% solution (?) ) makes no > sense to me. Sure it does, since how could I be sure that there was no underlying h/w issue? Copying it all thru the USB subssystem demonstrated that it wasn't a h/w fault. Or at least maybe the USB system is "better" at hiding faults. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
