On Wednesday 01 July 2009, Andrei Popescu wrote: > Though upgrading the kernel seems like a very big deal, sometimes > it's actually safer than other packages. 2.6.29 doesn't require newer > packages, so you don't actually need to backport it. And if you get > in trouble you can always boot 2.6.26 instead.
Yeah, that is true, but isn't there a greater risk that things are not that well tested, so that I may experience more obscure problems? I used to run more experimental and patchy stuff back in the day, but nowadays I have so little time for tweaking, that's why... Cheers, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer kje...@kjernsmo.net Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
