> > > >---- Original Message ---- >From: shi.min...@gmail.com >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org >Subject: Re: is it possible to install a desktop-manager without >python and perl? >Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:04:28 +0800 > >>On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Jochen Schulz<m...@well-adjusted.de> >wrote: >>> ??: >>>> >>>> thanks, but before I got the benifit of so many languages, I have >been >>>> tired of learning them, maybe it cannot be called "learning", >it's >>>> just some parallel memory, for none of them bring new concepts to >>>> C/C++. >>> >>> This is plain wrong. How do you do closures in C/C++? What about >higher >>> order functions, pattern matching, dynamic typing? How do you even >dare >>dynamic typing is so easy, for every object is a piece of memory, so >a >>dynamic type is just a memory type. >>I believe every language has its own advantages, my solution is to >>integrate all the advantages of all the languages into one language, >>which can be called any name, not only C/C++, just because gnu/linux >>is mainly written in C and C++ is the widely used OOP language, so I >>choose C/C++ as the basis. In this way, we get all the benifit, and >>avoid all the overlappings among different languages. >>> to complain about SQL (in another post of yours), if your only >complaint >>> is that it is unlike C in some respects? SQL (without stored >procedures) >>> is not even turing complete! >>I surely dare to complain sql, it's a programming languge with all >the >>general functions such as string processing, can't you hear the >>complaint from most programmers? microsoft has even replaced sql >>programming by .net framework. If you think I complain sql and other >>languages just because they are unlike C, you are too hard to >>communicate with. >>> >>> If you already know the terms I mentioned and still think they >don't add >>> anything to what's already in C/C++ then you didn't understand >them. >>> >>> J. >>> -- >>> Nothing is as I planned it. >>> [Agree] [Disagree] >>> ><http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html> >>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) >>> >>> iEYEARECAAYFAkpAuXEACgkQ+AfZydWK2zkcCACdFwBDimeLaDsEmUMKaS+m538u >>> ZcIAnRMQmtw186Ogzhud8Cx5GzZ9V2uN >>> =ZQgK >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Seems to me the US Government tried this with ADA, supposedly a "superset" of previous languages. Its failure is well-documented. Larry >> >> >> >>-- >>Gnu.Linux.(Debian|gNewSense).Gnome.(Mozilla|Gmail|Evolution|Scim|Fla >shplayer|Codeblocks) >>Microsoft.Windows.(Vista|XP).(QQ|Game|Notepad++) Gcc.Gtkmm.Opengl >>??????,??????,??????,???????....?????????????????,?????? >> >> >>-- >>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org >>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d >ebian.org >> >>
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
