On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:46, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 17:22, bob parker wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:25, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > > I particularly like the way it deletes the most significant figure(s) > > when you get an overflow in a numeric field. Or so it did last time I had > > anything to do with it. > > Must have been a compiler option or implementation decision. Our > programs machine checked on overflow.
Or maybe I'm just showing my age! - This was in the 1970's. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
