Harry Rickards wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > jida...@jidanni.org wrote: >> Why must emacs depend on sound packages? Is emacs >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_9000 and will talk to us? >> Isn't that an independent package, emacspeak? >> >> Shouldn't there be a way to install an emacs without sound packages? >> Even the nox version depends on them. Does emacs say things more than >> "beep" often? >> >> > I don't want to turn this into a flamewar, but couldn't you use another > editor, like vi, vim, nano, pico or ed?
Why would you even suggest that? Should we throw the baby (piece of software) out each time we find a particular bit of bathwater (problem)? Daniel -- (Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]
