In <20090429192819.gb1...@khazad-dum.debian.net>, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, martin f krafft wrote: >> also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <h...@debian.org> [2009.04.29.1522 +0200]: >> > As always, you MUST forbid lvm of ever touching md component >> > devices even if md is offline, and that includes whatever crap is >> > inside initrds... >> One should thus fix LVM to be a bit more careful... >It would need to start refusing devices with a raid superblock (all > types), unless forced.
The feature doesn't have to be perfect out of the box. It could initially just match 0.90 version superblocks and be extended later. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
