On Mar 26, 2009, at 8:44 AM, Chris Davies wrote:

leo <leona...@softel.cu> wrote:
when I exec ntpdate -u pool.ntp.org for example, the out is:
"no server suitable for synchronization found"

The NTP Pool servers are all run on a "best endeavours" basis. (I know,
because I run one.) So if one doesn't respond you should try the next.

Since you're running debian, the "correct" pool servers to try are these:

   0.debian.pool.ntp.org
   1.debian.pool.ntp.org
   2.debian.pool.ntp.org
   3.debian.pool.ntp.org

Ideally, instead of using ntpdate you should seriously consider running the ntp daemon itself (ntpd) from package 'ntp'. This has these servers
preconfigured, and it also steps the time correctly at boot so there's
almost no need for ntpdate.

Chris

Chris is absolutely right. The ntpdate program is no longer necessary with modern ntp daemons. The ntpd daemon knows enough to step the clock one time if it needs it at startup time.

Personally, I like to change the "server #.debian.pool.ntp.org" lines to "server #.us.pool.ntp.org" to make sure that the servers I'm using are geography-wise and network-topology-wise close by. Now, of course, if you don't live in the US, you should use your own country- code instead. But, of course again, if your country is so small that it doesn't have enough ntp servers to be useful, try picking one or more nearby countries with a larger flock of ntp servers.

But then, I'm a time fanatic. For most normal people, the debian pool servers in the unmodified /etc/ntp.conf file will do just fine.

Enjoy!

Rick


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to