On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:24:17 +0100 Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2009-03-25 19:58 +0100, Amit Uttamchandani wrote: > > > I have a fairly old laptop (500MHz G4) and I tend to compile a lot of > > applications from source. Most of time it doesn't take too long but > > when I compile large libraries or applications this sometimes takes 4-5 > > hours. > > > > An example is webkitgtk+ 1.1.3. I needed this to compile the latest > > version of midori. After a couple of hours of compilation, I paused the > > job using Ctrl-Z and suspended my laptop to RAM. The next morning, I > > resumed the laptop and typed 'fg' to resume the compile. > > Why did you not leave it running overnight to finish the compilation? > Ran out of juice in the battery and didn't have my charger ;) > > To my surprise, it worked fine and I was able to compile and install > > webkitgtk+ successfully. > > That doesn't really surprise me. As long as your laptop resumes from > suspend, this should never be a problem. > It makes sense now. > > Now, I am thinking of applying this to kernel compilation, etc. Is this > > common practice? Do others do this as well? > > Well, if you're running "make" to build the software, you can even > terminate it and shutdown your computer, because make is designed to > continue where it left off. At least if the Makefile isn't crap. > That's interesting... > Sven > > Thanks, Amit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org