On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Thorny <thorntreeh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have reordered your post to be in chronological order, suggestion below.

thanks. I post message in my mail client that puts quotes below reply. I'll
follow your rules.

>
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Michael Yang
> > <michael....@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> I have a Debian/Lenny 2.6.24 installed on my laptop (D630). I did a
> >> software upgrade just now (apt-get upgrade) and the keyboard doesn't
> >> work after that.
> >>
> >> I rebooted the system and now I have to type the letter twice to enter
> >> one letter, for example typing two 'a' for entering one 'a'.
> >>
> >> Anyone has idea of which package's upgrade caused this problem?
> >>
> >> Thanks so much.
> >> Michael
>
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:22:11 -0400, Michael Yang wrote:
>
> > The problem is resolved by downgrading xkb-data from 1.5-2 to 1.3-2.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Is there a specific reason you're using a 2.6.24 kernel with Lenny? My
> Dell works fine with 2.6.26.
>
> The version of xkb-data in Lenny is 1.3-2 so you may want to inspect your
> sources.list, your "upgrades" might be doing something of which you are
> not aware.

I've been happily using 2.6.24 kernel without meeting much problems.
Recently just out of curiosity I did a upgrade (not dist-upgrade yet). Is
there outstanding improvements in 2.6.26 that make it strongly recommended
to dist-upgrade? Because I have many packages and drivers to be re-compiled
if I do a dist-upgrade.

The source in my source list is:
deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb-src http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ testing main contrib non-free

I think the problem is caused by 'testing' dist previously referred to
'Lenny', but now referred to unstable? If I want to update my system for
lenny, do I need to change the 'testing' to 'stable'?

Thanks.


>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>

Reply via email to