On 2009-02-17_13:02:38, Rodolfo Medina wrote: >> I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the >> official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then Etch. >> >> Recently, many times I've been needing to use a testing/unstable Debian >> version for many applications that were too old in stable Debian, so now I'm >> thinking of switching to a testing/unstable Debian version for good. >> >> Now, my question is: which one is more advisable, testing or unstable? >> >> Excuse the basicness of my question, thanks for any reply
Paul E Condon <pecon...@mesanetworks.net> writes: > Rodolfo, > I have a different take on this issue. Rather than discuss the > relative merits of stable, testing, I think you should consider the > merits of lenny, squeeze. [...] Thanks for your contribution. But, if I understand well, the `unstable' option is excluded from your point of view, that only considers the alternative between stable and testing. Rodolfo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
