On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 06:22:29PM -0600, lostson wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 01:13 +0100, Frank Lanitz wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:41:49 -0500 > > "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtu...@vianet.ca> wrote: > > > > > Note also that the description of iceweasel is that it is lightweight. > > > > Well, I think this can be removed since Iceweasel/Firefox isn't > > lightweight anymore. > > I hate to butt in but do you see better behavior and performance from > say epiphany or galeon or some other browser ?
Konqueror. Surprised me a lot. Sure it uses resources, but it doesn't seem to leak them. I only use Iceweasel for sites that don't work with Konq. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
