On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:22:33 +1300 Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:45:39AM -0500, Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:20:02 +1300 > > Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:25:43AM -0500, Celejar wrote: > > > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:18:26 +0200 > > > > "Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [..] > > > > > video player: > > > > > > > > [G]mplayer > > > > > > You know gmplayer is broken, right? Compare 'top' with both for the same > > > movie. Note the CPU usage. > > > > On a couple of movies I had lying around, I saw several percent higher > > CPU utilization for gmplayer. i.e. something like 9 - 11% for mplayer, > > and 12 - 14% for gmplayer. I suppose that that would be a reason to > > How long did you watch it for? On the box where I noticed the anomaly, > it was sitting at 99% whereas "mplayer <samemovie>" sat at around 14%. A > google search confirmed that gmplayer was the cause. There are other GUI > frontends but I've never looked at them. I have not seen anything like this with the files I have tried (youtube .flv videos mostly). > Chris. Celejar -- mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
