On Wed,19.Nov.08, 14:02:37, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > On Wednesday 19 November 2008, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote about 'Re: Q: List Policy': > >On Mon,17.Nov.08, 22:03:20, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > >> It would be nice for the list to auto-respond to any HTML posting with > > > >I'm pretty sure you won't see something like this from Debian lists. > > :( Why not? Some enforcement of List Policy wouldn't be bad. Maybe, but the autoresponder stuff is just not The Debian Way (tm). Besides, the regular threads like this one already serve as reminder for those who would care. The people who don't care about the CoC would just ignore (or filter out) the auto-responder.
> >> As far as the CC's, I suppose I'll just have to admonish those > >> individuals directly. (It would be nigh impossible for the list > >> software to know the the poster had requested a CC or not.) I can > >> always killfile them if they get too annoying. ;) > > > >This works for me (with maildrop): > > > ># bad replies from lists > >if (/^(To|Cc):.*lists.debian.org/:h && > > /^(To|Cc):[EMAIL PROTECTED]/:h) to Maildir/.Junk/ > > Hard to apply list-wide since sometimes a CC *is* requested. My point was > that the list software can't tell if the poster requested a CC or not. Not list-wide, this is for personal use only. > Also, I'm not subscribed to every Debian list, and this rule might throw > away something that was sent to both me and a list I'm not on. It's not really thrown away, it just goes to a special folder and makes the repeated "offenders" easier to spot ;) Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
