Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Seriously, the reason I've been thinking about keeping the mail on the > sending system is to make reference easier -- in case the mail server > goes wrong or something. In the past it seems like things go wrong in > bunches, so I've started to plan for multiple failures when I'm setting > things up. If the messages stay on the originating system until KMail > picks them up, then there's no chance of them getting lost on a 3rd > system.
I would think it more important to get them off those other machines and onto the mail server so they can be backed up now. There's what, fifve harddrives on those machines which may fail at any time. The server's only got one drive for you to worry about, and presumably it gets far better care than the satellite systems. > > >> If you don't agree with me, you are worse than Hitler!!! > > > > > > You mean there are people who agree with you?!? > > > > Only those who are right-minded... > > You misspelled Reich. Don't ask him about Paris Hilton. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
