2008/11/7 Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> On Fri,07.Nov.08, 20:57:08, Sam Kuper wrote:
>
> > If one of the imported email addresses is, say, the debian-user mailing
> list
> > address rather than, for instance, a friend's email address, then the
> user
> > has abused the facility. Reverbnation is quite right to provide an abuse
> > link. It's actually much like the confirmation email the debian-user list
> > sends to people who sign up: to avoid a person subscribing someone who
> > doesn't wish to be subscribed.
>
> No it's not, because the default is "you are subscribed". Only spammers
> do this.


Except that Reverbnation has obviously had confirmation (wrongly, but
nonetheless) from I Am Three that debian-user already opted in. So in a
sense the site is less at fault than, say, Hotmail, which allows people to
send emails to anyone without an easy option for recipients to report abuse.

So the spammer here is I Am Three, and reporting their abuse of
Reverbnation's mailing list is all I did.

Frankly, I could have just done it without bothering to notify the list, but
I thought it would be more polite to tell the list.


> > So, frankly, given that at least one person on debian-user (me) doesn't
> want
> > to be emailed concert dates, album release info, etc, from I Am Three*, I
> > think that my choosing option three was entirely appropriate.
>
> No it was not. Besides, you can't write on behalf of debian-user (only
> the listmasters can).


Well, was I acting on behalf of debian-user or on behalf of myself? I don't
want debian-user to be spamming me any more than I want reverbnation to
forward me I Am Three spam. Best to cut it off at the source, I say. So
that's what I did.


> If you really want to do something about spam then
> *bounce* it (some mail clients call this "redirect") to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

My mail client doesn't have this feature, so that's clearly not a terribly
usable means for reporting spam.

Above all, I'm pretty annoyed at the suggestion that I've done something
wrong here, rather than doing the community a favour.

I considered my action carefully, researched it sufficiently, and notified
the community of it. Furthermore, in other cases when I've had spam sent to
me (direct from spammers, rather than from legitimate mailing-list services
being abused by their users) via the debian-user list, I've reported them
according to policy - again, doing the community a favour.

That's as much time as I'll spend on this thread.

Sam

Reply via email to