* Carl Fink ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [19.09.08 21:33]: > > > > A hidden ESSID is *not* standard compliant, so actually noone has to > > care about such situations. I ran into this with my iwl3945. > > There's a difference between "standards compliant" and "common". If we only > cared about standards compliance, we wouldn't support NTFS or Office > formatted documents.
Don't blame the messenger, I was just told that. BTW: WiFi *is* a standard, so one should care about it's specs. And this states iirc that the ESSID should *not* be hidden. Sebastian -- " Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. " Karl Marx [EMAIL PROTECTED]@N GÜNTHER mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp9HICR78OmT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
