Johann Spies wrote:
> My experience is not that it is 'horribly slow and
> inefficient'. Are you sure that it is not a network-related slowness?
Of course it is, the fact that mutt is using the network to
download-then-upload the messages is the entire problem! Which is going to be
faster:
A: Downloading 2000 messages totaling 10Mb over a 300kps connection then
upload them to the Trash folder on a 35kps upload.
B: Tell the server, "copy these 2000 messages to the Trash folder using the
local system BUS oh, and mark them as deleted, thanks."
Local system BUS > pretty much any broadband connection there is.
> To use mutt with more than one imap-account, just create a different
> mutt-configuration file for each one.
Yeah, not the same, not even close.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
