On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 03:05, Alan Connor wrote: > > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 28 23:47:50 2003 > > > > > > Alan Connor wrote: > > >>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 28 20:12:58 2003 > > > > > > > The stupid idiot must have have jumped to the insane conclusion that you > > were reading this with mutt from the irrelevant facts that you were > > complaining that you couldn't read it and that you said you were using mutt. > > > > Imagine! believing what you told him instead of looking for the "enough > > clues in my posts" to deduce you were talking crap! > > > > I think I'll killfile him too, in case he starts believing what I say. > > > > > > > > I didn't say anything about killfiling Colin. Are you troll? > > > > I DO use mutt to post with, and slrn to read the posts off usenet. > > Obviously, neither can do anything with what ended up on usenet.... > > > I believe that I am being blamed for someone else's ignorance or selfishness. > > THEY were unaware or disdainful of the fact that a LOT of people read ldu from > the usenet. There was a thread on the subject earlier, the latter part of which > made it onto the mailing list. I participated in that thread. In fact, it was > initiated by a fellow kind enough to point out that my posts to the newsfeed > were not making it onto the mailing list, which I did not realize. > > > PGP, attachments, and HTML have no place on the usenet, and people whose posts > ultimately end up there, or those responsible for the delivery, need to observe > proper netiquette. At least that's my take on the subject, and that of many > others. > > I DO wonder what the mailing list posting rules are, and will look into it. > > > Meanwhile, welcome to my killfile, ya jerk. > > > Alan > > > > -- > For Linux/Bash users: Eliminate spam from your life > with the Mailbox-Sentry-Program. See the thread > MSP on comp.mail.misc for the latest version. >
I know, I'm late on this one (for all those who wish this thread would end,) but PGP is considered very appropriate on Usenet - wander into any of the news.* hierarchy (one of the Big-Eight hierarchies) and you will find all manner of posts, particularly on posted reports, PGP or GPG signed to indicate that they are authoritatively from who they claim to be. This is particularly the case in the news.admin groups, where spoofing of emails has been a problem in the past. PGP/GPG is something I value on posts here as it reflects that I am not getting someone from Microsoft or SCO pretending to be someone regular and trusted on this list, offering *unhelpful* advice in their stead. -- Mark L. Kahnt, FLMI/M, ALHC, HIA, AIAA, ACS, MHP ML Kahnt New Markets Consulting Tel: (613) 531-8684 / (613) 539-0935 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
