On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:32:54 -0400 Telemachus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Telemachus,
> On Mon Jul 28 2008 @ 8:48, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > That could be risky; If Arvind writes multiple messages in a
> > thread, checking Subject alone is insufficient to be sure the
> > message being deleted is the correct one. That's why I suggested
> > M-ID: which is unique.
> You are absolutely right. I was hand-waving rather than giving a
> proper solution. To really do it right, given Arvind's specific
Sorry, I mis-interpreted your intention.
> I don't believe that Mutt by itself can do what you described. It
I don't think any of them could, can they? Although some would get
darned close.
> sounds more to me like a multi-part problem:
Indeed. Sadly, my scripting ability is nowhere near good enough to
write the necessary "magic".
> (Apologies if this is sent twice; my email froze up and died the
> first time I tried to send.)
So far, not to the list, just the one, plus the Cc: to me. I'm never
entirely sure why people do that. I mean, I'm subbed to the list, so
why the need for a copy? I'm not complaining, I'm just curious as to
why people do it, since I don't set a Reply-To: header with my addy in.
If anyone feels like answering that last bit, I suggest it's done
off-list since it's not a Debian issue at all.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad never immediately apparent"
It's becoming an obsession
Teenage Depression - Eddie & The Hot Rods
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
