On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 22:16:39 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:21:23PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 18:20 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 14:57 흍㒲횛漨꺋帢ᚯ禫 > > > > Paul, > > > > is your client hosed, or mine, or something else? The last two emails > > you sent only showed what is quoted above. On my screen it looks like > > asian writting and some block char and has one line. > > well, Paul's original mail looks good here in mutt/urxvt, though what > you've quoted clearly doesn't look right... Paul's messages appear fine here also, but comparing his messages with those of others using GPG signing (and hence using quoted-printable), the difference is that there is no 'charset' declared: (Paul) Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (Damon) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (Andrew) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (Various others) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (One other) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And so on. With no charset value, maybe the strange characters are because of some weird default character set on the system used to view the message? -- Bob Cox. Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK. Registered user #445000 with the Linux Counter - http://counter.li.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
