main:~# apt-cache policy | grep -i backport 1 http://www.backports.org etch-backports/non-free Packages release o=Backports.org archive,a=etch-backports,l=Backports.org archive,c=non-free origin www.backports.org 1 http://www.backports.org etch-backports/contrib Packages release o=Backports.org archive,a=etch-backports,l=Backports.org archive,c=contrib origin www.backports.org 1 http://www.backports.org etch-backports/main Packages release o=Backports.org archive,a=etch-backports,l=Backports.org archive,c=main origin www.backports.org
It looks like apt have an idea backports.org has priority of 1 when there is no entry in preferences file. Why? Don't get confused, since I have made some modifications to files. Now backports.org is identified by release statement, not origin. Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Wed,16.Jul.08, 00:03:45, Marko Randjelovic wrote: >> I use backports repo for Etch and when I put it to priority 500 (explicitely >> in /etc/apt/preferences), "apt-get >> dist-upgrade" says it wants to upgrade wine. If I don't say anything, it >> doesn't. Why is this happening, since default >> priority should also be 500? > > 'apt-cache policy' will show you apt's idea of priorities. > > Regards, > Andrei -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
